Institutionalizing Alternative Learning Spaces in Urban Communities: A Study of the Urban Islamic After-School Lab in Surabaya

Main Article Content

Nadlir Nadlir
Nasrul Fuad Erfansyah

Abstract

This study addresses two major challenges in urban communities, namely the predominantly administrative nature of university internship programs, which often have limited social impact, and the lack of structured alternative learning spaces to support elementary school students experiencing academic difficulties at home. In urban settings characterized by limited parental availability, economic pressures, and inadequate academic support at home, the need for community-based learning institutions has become increasingly important. This study examines the institutionalization of the Urban Islamic After-School Lab as an alternative learning space that integrates educational support, literacy development, and Islamic values in Surabaya. The study employed an action research approach involving fourth- and fifth-grade students in Babad Jerawat Urban Village, Surabaya. The research consisted of five stages, namely initial assessment, problem identification, focus group discussions, corrective action, and final assessment. The intervention focused on strengthening reading and religious literacy as essential components of students' academic and moral development. The findings indicate improvements in students' reading and religious literacy. Furthermore, the program transformed the university internship into a structured form of social engagement, strengthened university–community relationships, and revitalized the social role of higher education in urban communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nadlir, N., & Erfansyah, N. F. (2026). Institutionalizing Alternative Learning Spaces in Urban Communities: A Study of the Urban Islamic After-School Lab in Surabaya. The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences, 5(2), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.15642/sarpass.2026.5.2.262-276
Section
Articles

References

Blazer, C. (2016). After-school academic enrichment programs (Information Capsule No. 1509). Research Services, Miami-Dade County Public Schools.

Cheung, P. Y. (2012). Association of after-school physical activity levels and organized physical activity participation in Hong Kong children. European Physical Education Review, 18(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12440021

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6

Escudé, M., Rivero, E., & Montano, J. (2020). Designing for belonging and becoming in an afterschool tinkering program. Afterschool Matters, 31, 42–50.

Hirsch, B. J., Mekinda, M. A., & Stawicki, J. (2010). More than attendance: The importance of after-school program quality. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 447–452.

Huda, M. (2015). Model-model pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Institut Teknologi Bandung. (2022). Program Magang-Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka: Smarter World Living Lab. https://citylab.itb.ac.id

Junaidi, A. (2020a). Buku panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Junaidi, A. (2020b). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kahne, J., Nagaoka, J., Brown, A., O'Brien, J., Quinn, T., & Thiede, K. (2001). Assessing after-school programs as contexts for youth development. Youth & Society, 32(4), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X01032004002

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2022). Magang: Sambut karir masa depan dengan pengalaman kerja yang berharga. https://kampusmerdeka.kemdikbud.go.id

Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. (2006). Out-of-school-time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 275–313. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002275

Mardliyah, S., & Suharko. (2008). Sistem nilai budaya masyarakat urban terhadap pendidikan: Studi tentang putus sekolah, tinggal kelas, dan tidak dapat melanjutkan sekolah formal di jenjang pendidikan dasar pada rumah tangga Madura urban di Kelurahan Wonokusumo Kota Surabaya [Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada].

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2015). Afterschool programs. https://dese.mo.gov

Rachmadi, G., Hendriyana, H., & Mutaqin, K. (2022). Revitalisasi potensi perajin patung kriya Sanggar Utun Cibeusi pasca masa pandemi COVID-19. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 6(6), 1668–1680.

Rudiyanto. (2018). After school care: Alternatif layanan pendidikan dan pengasuhan bagi anak usia 6–8 tahun. Early Childhood: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(2a), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.35568/earlychildhood.v2i2a.266

Shilviana, K. F., & Hamami, T. (2020). Pengembangan kegiatan kokurikuler dan ekstrakurikuler. PALAPA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 159–177.

Takdir, M., Sani, K. R., Hasdinawati, H., Juniati, S. R., & Arifin, Z. (2021). Polemik implementasi program magang MBKM Program Studi Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Sinjai. Al Qisthi: Jurnal Sosial dan Politik, 11(2), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.47030/aq.v11i2.101

Weissman, S. A., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Attrition from after-school programs: Characteristics of students who drop out. Prevention Science, 2, 201–205.

Yohalem, N., Pittman, K., & Edwards, S. L. (2010). Strengthening the youth development/after-school workforce: Lessons learned and implications for funders. Cornerstones for Kids.

Yaumi, M., & Damopolii, M. (2014). Action research: Teori, model, dan aplikasinya. Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Zulkifli, A., Sari, F. M., & Prihati. (2021). Pemulihan ekonomi melalui pembangunan kebun bibit desa menggunakan metode Participatory Action Research (PAR). Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 356–364.