Explaining High Electoral Acceptance Amid International Integrity Concerns in Indonesia's 2024 Election
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/siyar.2025.5.2.157-185Keywords:
Electoral Integrity, Electoral Trust, Electoral Outcome Acceptance, Government Performance, Electoral Management BodyAbstract
One of the central issues in participatory democracy discourse concerns how the public perceives electoral integrity and accepts election outcomes. This study investigates the retrospective impact of regime performance and perceptions of electoral bureaucratic professionalism on trust and acceptance of the 2024 Indonesian presidential election results. Employing a quantitative-explanatory design with 250 respondents, data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings reveal that retrospective evaluations of government performance—particularly economic—positively and significantly influence both electoral trust and acceptance on result. Meanwhile, bureaucratic professionalism enhances electoral trust but does not directly affect acceptance. Theoretically, this study reinforces Easton’s political system model within an electoral framework and supports Norris’s electoral integrity model, suggesting that both regime performance and bureaucratic professionalism contribute to legitimizing election outcomes through the cultivation of systemic trust.Downloads
References
Anderson, Christopher J., André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Anderson, Christopher J., and Andrew J. LoTempio. “Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America.” British Journal of Political Science 32(2): 335–51, 2002.
Blais, André, Alexandre Morin-Chassé, and Shane P. Singh. “Election Outcomes, Legislative Representation, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Party Politics 23(2): 85–95, 2017.
Cameron, Sarah. “Government Performance and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 55(2): 170–90., 2020.
Cheeseman, N. “The Kenyan Elections of 2007: An Introduction”. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 2(2), 166–184., 2008.
Craig, Stephen C, James G Kane, and Stephen C Craig. “Winners, Losers , and Perceived Mandate : Voter Explanations of the 1998 Gubernatorial and 2000 Presidential Elections in Florida.” Political Research Quarterly 59(December): 579–92, 2006.
Easton, David. The Political System: An Inquiry Into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1953.
Easton, David. A Framework for Political Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1965a.
Easton, David. Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley, 1965b
Easton, David. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 435–57, 1975.
Girsang, Niko Aristian Pangihutan, Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa, and Ferry Kurnia Rizkiyansyah. “Integritas Penyelenggara Pemilu (Study Tentang Pemutakhiran Data Pemilih Di Kabupaten Simalungun Pada Pemilu Tahun 2019).” Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummanioramaniora 5(1): 125, 2021.
Gronke, Paul. The Measure of American Elections Voter Confidence as a Metric of Election Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Hair, Joseph F., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition. London: Taylor & Francis, 2021.
Kerr, Nicholas, and Anna Lührmann. “Public Trust in Elections: The Role of Media Freedom and Election Management Autonomy.” Electoral Studies (170): 1–24, 2017.
Langford, Malcolm, Rebecca Schiel, and Bruce M. Wilson. “The Rise of Electoral Management Bodies: Diffusion and Effects.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16(1): S60–84, 2021.
Mauk, Marlene. “Electoral Integrity Matters: How Electoral Process Conditions the Relationship between Political Losing and Political Trust.” Quality and Quantity 56(3): 1709–28, 2022.
Norris, Pippa. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014
Reller, Cassidy, Anthony Anderson, and Thad Kousser. “Are Elite Cues Necessary to Drive the ‘Winner Effect’ on Trust in Elections?” Electoral Studies, 80(September): 102541, 2022.
Ridge, Hannah M. “Fair Elections, Representation, and the Win-Loss Satisfaction with Democracy Gap.” Representation: 1–17. doi:10.1080/00344893.2024.2313764, 2024
Siachiwena, H., & Saunders, C. “Elections, Legitimacy, and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Africa Lessons from Zambia, Zimbabwe and Malawi”. Journal of African Elections, 20(1), 67–89, 2021.
Stewart, Charles. “Trust in Elections.” Daedalus 151(4): 234–53, 2022.
Tilley, James, and Sara B. Hobolt. “Losers’ Consent and Emotions in the Aftermath of the Brexit Referendum.” West European Politics 47(5): 1180–98, 2024.
V-Dem Institute. V-Dem Codebook V13: Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, 2023
World Values Survey. 2024-2026 World Values Survey Wave 8 Master Survey Questionnaire, 2024.
Zhai, Yida. 2019. “Popular Democratic Perception Matters for Political Trust in Authoritarian Regimes.” Politics 39(4): 411–29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mokhamad Abdul Azis, Dimas Lazuardy Firdauz, Rizky Bangun Wibisono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


