The Political Economy of Buzzer Actor Networks in Text Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15642/sarpass.2024.4.1.30-44Keywords:
Text production, agency, buzzer, politician, political economyAbstract
This article examines the network built by buzzers in the 2024 Presidential election. The basic assumption is that the buzzer phenomenon is an industry that affects political dynamics. This qualitative research uses network theory to identify the text production process carried out by buzzers, and uses a political economy approach to analyze the relationships formed between buzzers, agencies (buzzer industry) and politicians. Data were collected through interviews and documentation. The findings; first, there are 4 stages in the production of text on social media. This starts from the agency's process of recruiting potential buzzers to create texts according to the agency's framing. Second, the main actors of the buzzer industry are buzzers, agencies and politicians. In this relationship, the dominance of power is owned by the agency as an extension of politicians. The agency controls and encourages a narrative to be created. The first domination is done by politicians to the agency to produce text narratives according to their political interests. Then the agency transforms the interests of politicians or political parties to buzzers. Agencies and politicians are in the same line of interest, namely building a narrative of an interest. The visible relationship between the agency and the buzzer is a relationship between workers and service providers.Downloads
References
Aditya, Perdana dan Imam Muhammad. 2024. Judisialisasi Politik Dalam Putusan MK Terkait Batas Usia Cawapres Dalam Pilpres 2024. Jurnal Pengawasan Pemilu 4.
Ali, H. L. Purwandi. 2020. Indonesia 2020: Kelas Menengah Perkotaan Milennial, Jakarta, Alvara Reserach Centre.
Alfiyani, N. 2018. Media Sosial Sebagai Strategi Komunikasi Politik, Jurnal Potret Pemikiran, Vol. 22 no 2, Juli.
Almond, Gabriel dan G. B. Powell Jr. 2015. Comparative Politics: A Development Approach, Boston: Little Brown.
Bradshaw, S. & PN. Howard. 2019. The Global Disinformation Order 2019 global Inventory of organized Social Media Manipulation, NY Publisher.
B A. Conway, K. Kenski, D. Wang, The Rise of Twitter in The Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in The Presidential Primary, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 20 (4), 363- 380.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124
CIPG, Di Balik Fenomena Buzzer: Memahami Lanskap Industri dan Pengaruh Buzzer di Indonesia, (PDF) Center Innovation Policy and Governance (CIPG), Klara Esti, and Rinaldi Camil
CNN Indonesia Connected. 2023. Saat Buzzer Jadi Sorotan, Saat "Buzzer" Jadi Sorotan - YouTube, diakses pada 08 September 2023.
Danas, ed. 2018. Milenial Campuran Pemasaran dan Komunikasi. Fantasious x Loveable. Jakarta: Sahara.
Farid, Ahmad Salman. 2023. Penggunaan Media Sosial Dalam Kampanye Politik Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Partisipasi Politik Dan Persepsi Publik, QAULAN Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam 4, no. 1 0.
Graham Murdock. 2016. Culture, Communications and Political Economy dalam James Curran dan Michael Gurevith, London: Mass Media and Society.
Gunanto et al. 2023. Dinamika Koalisi Partai Politik dalam pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pada Pemilu 2024. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara 4039, no. May (2024): 57–67.
Jati, W. R, 2017. Aktivisme Kelas Menengah Berbasis Media Sosial: MunculnyaRelawan dalam Pemilu 2014. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 2017, Vol. 20(2).
Juditha, Christiany. 2019. Buzzer di Media Sosial Pada Pilkada dan pemilu di Indonesia, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Komunikasi dan Informatika, #3
Latour, Bruno. 2009. Reassembling The Social: A Introduction to Actor Network Theory, Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
Loveman, Chris. 2002. Assesing The Phenomenon of Proxy Intervention, dalam Conflict, Security and Development, Vol.2 No.3, Desember
Mas’oed. Mochtar. 1999. Negara, Kapital dan demokrasi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mumford, Andrew. 2013. Proxy Warfare and The Future Conflict, dalam The RUSI Journal, Vol 158, Number 2
Muchtar, K. Komunikasi Politik dan pembentukan Citra Partai, Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Vol 14 (2), 136-147.
Mustika, R. Pergeseran Peran Buzzer ke Dunia Politik di Media Sosial Shifting The Role of Buzzer To The World of Politics on, 2(2), 144-151
Mosco, The Political Economy of Communication: Building a Foundation, In The Political Economy of Communication.
Surzhko-Harned, L., & Zahuranec, A. J., Framing the Revolution: the role of social media in Ukraine‘s Euromaidan Movement, Nationalities Papers 45 (5), 2017, 759.
Murdoch Golding, Peter dan Graham Murdock, 2019. The Political Economy of Media, NY: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ruth Hanna, Apriani Sihombing, and Silvia Mahrani, 2024. “Jurnal+Htn+Kel+4+(1)” 3, no. 3 (2024): 488–97.
Saraswati, M. 2018. Social Media and the Political Campaign Industry in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia Volume 3(1).
Sudibyo, Agus. 2016. Politik Media dan Pertarungan Wacana, Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Walsham, G. 2019. Actor Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Cuture Prospect, in A. Lee Liebenau, J. degross (Eds), Information Systems and Qualitative research Chapman and Hall, London: Sage Publishing.
Wawancara
DN, Wawancara, Tanggal 22 dan 24 Juli 2024.
Aven Januar, Wawancara, Tanggal 30 Juli 2024
Haryadi Yutanto, Wawancara, Tanggal 21 Juni 2024
MSA, Wawancara, Tanggal 16 Agustus 2024
Hasil Focus Group Discussion, Tanggal 16 Juli 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ainur Rofiq Al Amin, Muh. Yusrol Fahmi, Laili Bariroh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


