RELIGION, CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION, AND MODERNIZATION

A Narrative on the Shift of Religious Paradigm of the Community in Surakarta

Authors

  • Lilam Kadari Nuriyanto Lilam Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
  • Mibtadin Univesitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Arnis Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15642/sarpass.2022.1.2.179-190

Keywords:

Religion, Religious Culture, Modernization, Religious Paradigm, Surakarta

Abstract

Globalization is characterized by advances in science and technology that are inevitable by the community, including the people of Surakarta. People in Surakarta are in dilemma between tradition and modernization. Education, transportation, and economic advancement have transformed the social, religious, and cultural aspects of the people in Surakarta over the last three decades. Thus, how is the narrative of the paradigm shift of religiosity of the Surakarta community amid modernization? This descriptive qualitative study collected data through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The analysis employed an interactive analysis model. The findings revealed that the paradigm shift of religiosity of the Surakarta community is directly proportional to the social, political, economic, and cultural changes. There is a shift in the religious perspective of the Surakarta community known as hijrah from the abangan Muslim community to Islamist activism or new santri with all the limitations of understanding and Islamic doctrine, which requires assistance in terms of Javanese Islamic culture and local beliefs to avoid uprooting them. As a result of hijrah and becoming Islamic activism, people left the Javanese culture such as Kejawen and local beliefs. However, some of them have transformed the culture to fit the teachings of Islam. So far, those who hijrah to NU still adhere to religious traditions and even transform Javanese culture to suit the times. Meanwhile, Islamic activism has left Javanese Islamic traditions and local beliefs. The shift in religious paradigm asserts two things. They are internal and external encouragement. First, internal factors are in the form of encouragement from within religious communities. Second, external factors are external stimuli that can encourage a shift in the Surakarta community's religious perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. (2011). Studi Agama. Normativitas dan Historisitas, cet. V. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Aijuddin Anas. (2008). Laporan Penelitian Transformasi Sosial Gerakan Keagamaan di Surakarta. Jakarta.

Barbour, I. G. (1980). ”Paradigms in Science and Religion”. In Garry Gutting, (ed.), Paradigms and Revolutions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Connoly, Peter. (2002). Approaches to the Study of Religiondalam Aneka Pendekatan Studi Agama. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Effendi, Bahtiar. (2010). Islam dan Negara. Jakarta: Paramadina. Jakarta: Paramadina.

Fanani, Zainudin. (2002). Radikalisme Keagamaan dan Perubahan Sosial. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press dan Asia Foundation.

Fanani, A. (2017). Moderasi Pemikiran Fikih Hubungan Antarumat Beragama di Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid Muhammadiyah. SHAHIH : Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary, 2(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v2i1.705

Gaffar, Affan. (1999). Politik Indonesia: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hardiman, F. Budi. (2009). Demokrasi Deliberatif: Menimbang Negara Hukum dan Ruang Publik dalam teori Diskursus Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Hasan, Noorhaidi. (2011). Milisia Islami, Demokrasi, dan Hak Asasi Manusi. Jurnal Dignitas, Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia, Volume VII.

Idharam, Syaikh. (2011). Mereka Memalsukan Kitab-kitab Karya Ulama Klasik: Episode Kebohongan Publik Sekte Salafi Wahhabi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pesantren.

Jamil, Mukhsin. (2007). Agama-agama Baru di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kahmad Dadang S. (2002). Sosiologi Agama. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Lederach, Paul. (2003). Conflict Transformation. New York: Good Books, Skyhorse Publishing. Inc.

Mibtadin. (2008). Gerakan Keagamaan Kontemporer: Studi Potensi Konflik Atas Perkembangan Majelis Tafsir Alquran di Surakarta. Semarang.

Mibtadin. (2017). Gerakan Sosial Masyarakat Sipil. Studi Gerakan Sosial LKiS, Fahmina, dan The Wahid Institute. Yogyakarta: UIN Suka, Disertasi tidak diterbitkan.

Mibtadin. (2018). The Urban Sufism, Social Change, and The Smiling Islam: A Case Study Hubbun Nabi Kartasura Sukoharjo. Analisa Journal, Volume 3 N.

Mibtadin. (2019). Khutbah, Ujaran Kebencian, dan Keberagamaan Jamaah: Kajian Atas Materi Khutbah di Masjid-masjid di Kota Surakarta. Yogyakarta: Gerbang Media.

Mibtadin. (2020). Ormas, Keislaman, dan Keindonesiaan. Pandangan dan Prkatik Moderasi Beragama Ormas Islam di Surakarta: MTA, FPI, MMI, dan LUIS. Jakarta.

Misrawi, Zuhairi. (2008). Al-Qur’an Kitab Toleransi. Inklusivisme, Pluralisme, dan Multikulturalisme. Jakarta: Fitrah.

Mulyadi, Hari, dkk. (1999). Runtuhnya Kekuasaan Keraton Alit. Studi Mobilisasi Sosial Masyarakat Solo dan Kerusuhan Mei 1998 di Surakarta. Surakarta: LPTP.

Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. (1991). The Meaning and End Religio, A New Approach to the Religious Tradition of Mankind. New York: Mentor Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/598421

Sodik Mochmmad. (2006). ”Pendekatan Sosologi” dalam Dudung Abdurrahman (ed.) Metodologi Penelitian Agama. Yogyakarta: Kurnia Kalam Semesta.

Suprayogo Imam & Tabrani. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Agama. Bandung: Rosda karya.

Sutopo, Habertus. (1988). Pengantar Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Teoretis dan Praktis. Surakarta: Pusat Penelitian UNS.

Ulum, Bahrul. (2002). Bodohnya NU Apa NU Dibodohi? Jejak Langkah NU Era Reformasi: Mengikuti Khittah, Meneropong Paradigma Politik. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz.

Weintraub, Andrew N. (2011). Islam and Popular Culture in Indonesia and Malaysia. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-25

How to Cite

Lilam, L. K. N., Mibtadin, M., & Arnis, A. R. (2022). RELIGION, CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION, AND MODERNIZATION: A Narrative on the Shift of Religious Paradigm of the Community in Surakarta . The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences, 1(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.15642/sarpass.2022.1.2.179-190

Issue

Section

Articles