EXPLORATION OF HI-RES SIKAP: PATRIARCHAL ATTITUDE AND SUPPORT FOR MILITARISTIC GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA

Main Article Content

Lalu Ary Kurniawan Hardi
Alifia Moci Maritta

Abstract

This study investigates whether patriarchal attitudes predict public support for a militaristic government in Indonesia amid concerns about democratic backsliding and renewed military influence in civilian politics. Drawing on nationally distributed survey data from the 2025 HI-RES SIKAP project (N ≈ 2,500), the analysis examines whether agreement with the belief that men are better political leaders than women is associated with stronger endorsement of military rule when civilian institutions are perceived as ineffective. Using ordinary least squares regression with sequential model specifications, the study controls for nationalism, trust in religious leaders, education, income, sex, religiosity, support for democracy, tolerance for electoral violence, and presidential preference. The findings demonstrate that patriarchal attitude is a robust and statistically significant predictor of support for militaristic governance across all models. Interaction analysis further reveals that the effect is particularly pronounced among female respondents. Overall, the results underscore the central role of gender ideology in shaping orientations toward authority, hierarchy, and coercive political order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hardi, L. A. K., & Maritta, A. M. (2026). EXPLORATION OF HI-RES SIKAP: PATRIARCHAL ATTITUDE AND SUPPORT FOR MILITARISTIC GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA. Indonesian Journal of Political Studies, 6(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijps.2026.6.1.81-104
Section
Articles

References

Alotaibi, N. B., Aldakheel, A., & Almehaizie, N. (2024). Patriarchal beliefs and conventional understanding of family honor as obstacles of women’s empowerment. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13(5), 301. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0166

Anugrah, I. (2020, April 15). The illiberal turn in Indonesian democracy. Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus. https://apjjf.org/2020/7/anugrah

Bayer, M., Croissant, A., Izadi, R., & Scheeder, N. (2023). Multidimensional Measures of Militarization (M3): A global dataset. Armed Forces & Society, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x231215295

Blanchard, E. M. (2003). Gender, international relations, and the development of feminist security theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), 1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1086/368328

Brechenmacher, S. (2024). Why gender is central to the antidemocratic playbook: Unpacking the linkages in the United States and beyond. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/11/women-lgbtq-democracy-authoritarianism-trump?lang=en

Brunelli, S. M., Gagne, J. J., Huybrechts, K. F., Wang, S. V., Patrick, A. R., Rothman, K. J., & Seeger, J. D. (2013). Estimation using all available covariate information versus a fixed look-back window for dichotomous covariates. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 22(5), 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3434

Burke, C. (1998). Women and militarism. Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.

Cockburn, C. (2010). Gender relations as causal in militarization and war. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(2), 139–157.

Cockburn, C., & Enloe, C. (2012). Militarism, patriarchy and peace movements. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.726098

Elveren, A. Y., & Moghadam, V. M. (2019). The impact of militarization on gender inequality and female labor force participation (Working Paper No. 1307). Economic Research Forum. https://erf.org.eg/app/uploads/2019/06/1307.pdf

Enloe, C. (1983). Does khaki become you? The militarisation of women’s lives. Pluto Press.

Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics (2nd ed.). University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6

Hallagan, D. (2012). Patriarchy and militarism. Verbum, 10(1), 53–58. https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/verbum/vol10/iss1/15/

Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9wx3

Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2025). Rilis Indikator 27 Mei 2025. https://indikator.co.id/rilis-indikator-27-mei-2025/

Kaplan, L. D. (1994). Woman as caretaker: An archetype that supports patriarchal militarism. Hypatia, 9(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00436.x

Khalid, M. (2014). Feminist perspectives on militarism and war: Critiques, contradictions, and collusions. In Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943494.013.006

Koch, M. T., & Fulton, S. A. (2011). In the defense of women: Gender, office holding, and national security policy in established democracies. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 1–16.

Korolczuk, E., Graff, A., & Kantola, J. (2025). Gender danger: Mapping a decade of research on anti-gender politics. Journal of Gender Studies, 34(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2025.2489584

Muhtadi, B. (2022). The Indonesian military enjoys strong public trust and support: Reasons and implications. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/TRS19_22.pdf

Park, S. S. (2017). Gendered representation and critical mass: Women’s legislative representation and social spending in 22 OECD countries. Sociological Perspectives, 60(6), 1097–1114.

Prügl, E. (2023). Gender as a cause of violent conflict. International Affairs, 99(5), 1885–1902. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad184

Rabasa, A., & Haseman, J. (2002). The military and democracy in Indonesia: Challenges, politics, and power. RAND. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2002/MR1599.pdf

Sumaktoyo, N., & Kuipers, N. (2024, March 5). Introducing the HI-RES SIKAP of Indonesian voters. New Mandala. https://www.newmandala.org/introducing-the-hi-res-sikap-of-indonesian-voters/