Young People and the Shadow of Populism: Reconsidering Democracy and Political Transformation in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Oct 30, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/ijps.2025.5.2.151-167
Keywords:
Populism, Youth, Democracy, Political Transformation

Main Article Content

Alif Hasugian
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Abstract

This paper examines the role of youth within the contemporary political landscape marked by populism. Populism is a form of politics that emphasizes the antagonism between the 'people' versus the 'elite'. As the group most actively supportive of democracy, youth can either reproduce or resist populist narratives. Employing a descriptive qualitative method based on literature review and critical discourse analysis, this study demonstrates that youth play an ambivalent role. On the one hand, populism opens up space for political participation and the expression of generational idealism; on the other hand, it has the potential to deepen identity polarization and weaken the quality of democracy. The author argues that the sustainability of Indonesian democracy is highly dependent on the direction of youth's political idealism whether it is channeled towards an inclusive discourse or becomes trapped in exclusive antagonism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasugian, A. (2025). Young People and the Shadow of Populism: Reconsidering Democracy and Political Transformation in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Political Studies, 5(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijps.2025.5.2.151-167
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): October
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s Democratic Paradox: Competitive Elections amidst Rising Illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412

Berman, S. (2017). Populism is a Symptom Rather than a Cause: Democratic Disconnect, the Decline of the Center-Left, and the Rise of Populism in Western Europe. The University of Chicago Press Journal, 49(4), 443–448. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/705378

BPS. (2023). Statistik Pemuda Indonesia 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Dalton, R. J. (2017). The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality. Oxford University Press.

Dhakidae, D. (2003). Cendekiawan dan Kekuasaan dalam Negara Orde Baru. Gramedia.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Feixa, C., Nilan, P., & Leccardi, C. (2006). Global Youth? Hybrid Identities, Plural World. Routledge.

Haboddin, M. (2019). Populisme, Politik Pertahanan, Dan Pemimpin Lokal. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4802

Hadut, A. D. (2024). Kepemimpinan Populisme Jokowi dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Degradasi Kualitas Demokrasi. Jurnal Akademika, 24(1), 36–47.

Henn, M., & Foard, N. (2014). Social differentiation in young people’s political participation: The impact of social and educational factors on youth political engagement in Britain. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.830704

Inayatul, M., Andi, A., & Hasyim, J. (2024). Islam dan Politik Identitas: Suatu Keharusan atau Pencegahan. Tolis Ilmiah: Jurnal Penelitian, 7(1), 1–9.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

Leininger, A., & Meijers, M. J. (2021). Do Populist Parties Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence From Over 40 Years of Electoral History in 31 European Democracies. Political Studies, 69(3), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720923257

Levitsky, S., & Roberts, K. M. (2011). The resurgence of the Latin American left. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782

Mietzner, M. (2015). Reinventing Asian Populism: Jokowi’s Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia. East-West Center.

Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press.

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education.

Noack, P., & Eckstein, K. (2023). Populism in youth: Do experiences in school matter? Child Development Perspectives, 17(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12481

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

Panizza, F. (2005). Populism and the mirror of democracy. Verso.

Rooduijn, M. (2019). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Consortium for Political Research, 58(1), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

Wahyuningroem, S. L., Sirait, R., Uljanatunnisa, U., & Heryadi, D. (2024). Youth political participation and digital movement in Indonesia: the case of #ReformasiDikorupsi and #TolakOmnibusLaw. F1000Research, 12(May), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122669.3