Digital-Based Public Service Transformation Through the Implementation of the Probolinggo Portal: A Study at the Department of Communication and Informatics of Probolinggo Regency

Main Article Content

Muhammad Hasan
Siti Marwiyah
Mastina Maksin

Abstract

This Digital transformation in public service delivery has become a strategic agenda in government reform, particularly through the adoption of information technology-based systems. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Probolinggo Portal as a digital public service innovation in Probolinggo Regency, with a focus on the role of the Department of Communication and Informatics as the primary managing institution. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed to explore the implementation dynamics through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation. The analysis was conducted using Edward III’s policy implementation framework, which includes communication, resources, implementers’ disposition, and bureaucratic structure. The findings indicate that the Probolinggo Portal has contributed to improving service efficiency, enhancing transparency, and expanding public access to government services. At the same time, several challenges remain, including limited communication effectiveness, uneven digital infrastructure, varying levels of digital literacy among citizens, and suboptimal inter-agency coordination. The interaction among implementation variables demonstrates a strong interdependence, where weaknesses in one dimension affect the overall effectiveness of the policy. The study highlights that successful digital public service implementation requires an integrative approach that goes beyond technological adoption, emphasizing organizational capacity building, adaptive communication strategies, and inclusive service accessibility for citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasan, M., Marwiyah, S., & Maksin , M. (2026). Digital-Based Public Service Transformation Through the Implementation of the Probolinggo Portal: A Study at the Department of Communication and Informatics of Probolinggo Regency. Jurnal PUBLIQUE, 7(1), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.15642/publique.2026.7.1.149-164
Section
Articles

References

Bertot, J. C., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2016). Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005

Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

Dwiyanto, A. (2011). Manajemen pelayanan publik: Peduli, inklusif, dan kolaboratif. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. SAGE Publications.

Indrajit, R. E. (2006). Electronic government: Strategi pembangunan dan pengembangan sistem pelayanan publik berbasis teknologi digital. Andi.

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001

Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007

Linders, D. (2019). Public sector digital service design: The role of user-centered approaches. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101387

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13202

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

OECD. (2020). Digital government index 2019 results. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government-index-2019-results.htm

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/38748/uu-no-25-tahun-2009

United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428.